By Mike Thayer
Currently there are two men in Iowa's First District who have publicly stated a desire to run for Congress, hoping to be the Republican nominee to face off in November against liberal lawyer and Democrat incumbent Bruce Braley.
One is an officially declared candidate, the other is in "Exploratory Committee" status. It's January 2012, the election season is now in full swing. How seriously can voters regard the Republican potential in District 1?
Rod Blum of Dubuque, Iowa is an announced candidate. He's got a campaign website, he submitted paperwork with the Federal Election Commission as an official candidate, although the information he filed was inadequate according to the FEC. Perhaps just a rookie mistake.... The FEC letter requesting more information wanted a response back from Blum by December 28. He didn't meet that deadline, there is no update from him in the record. That's a problem.
Blum announced his run in October 2011 and has made campaign trail appearances ever since. He even has a page on his website highlighting some of those appearances. But according to the FEC, he doesn't have any money. When you bring up his name on the FEC site to look at contributions to his campaign and compare it to Bruce Braley's campaign, Blum's financial number is "0". Granted, Blum has until January 31 to file a report for money raised during the 4th quarter of 2011, but word from my county road sources is.... Blum isn't raking in much cash, not much at all. That's a problem. It indicates a lack of voter interest in the guy.
Liberal lawyer Bruce Braley has over $450,000 cash on hand (largely from out-of-state and PAC sources) for his 2012 re-election bid. How can Blum compete against that? Answer: He can't.
Perhaps he'll prove me wrong with his January 31 filing, but I don't think so.
The void gets bigger.
Ben Lange, an attorney from Independence, Iowa ran against attorney Bruce Braley in 2010, losing to the liberal by a little more than 4,000 votes. He hasn't officially declared himself a candidate yet for 2012 according to the FEC but he did form an exploratory committee in October. Here's the problem, he's told people on the "Exploratory Committee" a'hem, campaign trail in District 1 that he has financial backing to the tune of six figures.... Now a commitment of funding and actual receipt of funding are two different things, but if he does indeed have that kind of backing, then why keep things in exploratory committee status? Logically and more importantly legally, you would officially announce, file and that would generate even more campaign cash. You would promote the support, market testimonials and endorsements and that generates even more campaign cash. You would do that sooner rather than later because any candidate intent on making a serious run for this seat has got an uphill battle against Braley who has over $450,000 cash on hand. So is Lange's six-figure claim true or an inflated tale? If it's the latter, that's a problem. People don't want to be fed a line of bull, the folks in District 1 already get more than enough of that from Braley and they're tired of it. The last thing they want is more of the same.
Here's the thing, according to FEC rules, if Lange has collected even just $5,000 dollars while in Exploratory Committee status, then he is obligated by law to file a Statement of Candidacy, FEC Form 2. He hasn't. By law he can no longer remain in Exploratory Committee status, he MUST file to be a candidate. In a review of FEC reporting, Lange never closed out his previous campaign for Congress, he still has a little over $3,500 on the books. So what are the possibilities here? Does Lange have two sets of books, one for 2010 as a candidate and another as 'Exploratory' for 2012? If he hasn't collected $5,000 since announcing he was testing the water in October 2011, then that can be an indication not enough people are interested in backing him this election cycle. To be fair, a candidate may tell potential donors to hold off on actually writing the checks until the official candidacy announcement is made and Lange may very well have been doing that. But that brings up another problem for Lange.
FEC Campaign Finance Rules and Regulations, Chapter 1, Page 1: Campaigning (As opposed to testing the waters) is apparent, for example, when individuals:
- Take action to qualify for the ballot
Download Campaign Finance Rules and Regs
Ben Lange took action to qualify for the ballot on caucus night by having petitions for voters to sign at various caucus sites throughout the district. I contacted several county Republican central committee chairs and/or committee members throughout District 1 and they confirmed the presence of Lange nomination petitions. Not just "Let's urge Ben Lange to run for Congress" petitions mind you, but Ben-Lange's-name-to-be-placed-on-the-primary-ballot petitions. Now if I'm interpreting the FEC information above correctly, you have to be a declared candidate to do that. FEC rules state that exploratory committee status must be terminated, official candidacy declared and paperwork be filed as an official candidate..... THEN petitions to have your name placed on the primary ballot can be put out. Lange didn't do that, he is a lawyer, he's run for this office before, you would think he would be familiar with the rules.
The following was obtained by the Coralville Courier, content from a cover letter accompanying the nomination petitions submitted to all the counties in Iowa's District 1 by volunteer Melanie Weber, who coordinated the nomination petition drive and by the way, she also did volunteer work for Ben Lange during his 2010 campaign:
In advance of the Caucus, I'm forwarding nomination petitions, so that in the event Ben Lange officially enters the 2012 Congressional race he will have the necessary signatures on the nomination petitions. I'd appreciate it if you'd be willing to ensure these petitions are distributed to each of your county precinct chairman so that the necessary signatures from your county can be obtained. I have also included a self-addressed envelope so that the signed nomination petitions can be promptly returned.
That's a problem folks. If an average Joe like me raises an eyebrow and says, "HUH?" over these mistakes by Lange, imagine what liberal lawyer Bruce Braley is going to with this information..... And make no mistake - Braley's campaign is watching, they're fully aware. Without question the Braley campaign is monitoring the FEC site, which does not have any paperwork on file where Lange has declared his candidacy for 2012. Lange's petition drive was a big no-no.
Which begs the question: Are the signatures Lange collected from petitions on caucus night any good?

You obviously don't have a clue what you are talking and writing about.
Posted by: Efus McWawa | January 20, 2012 at 08:24 AM
Efus McWawa huh?
Chris Reed? Is that you?
Where's your example of not having a clue?
Posted by: WHITFIELDMARISOL32 | January 20, 2012 at 11:11 AM
You DO know that Coralville
isn't IN the Iowa's NEW First District,
don't you Mike?
Posted by: Efus McWawa | January 26, 2012 at 10:55 PM
Efus,
I live in District 4, and I read the Coralville Courier. What's your point?
Posted by: WHITFIELDMARISOL32 | January 27, 2012 at 08:37 AM
The only "void" is in your knowledge of Rod Blum and his campaign. Can't wait to see your follow-up report to your Clayton County GOP meeting, so we can all see how perceptive and objective your "no spin" zone really is.
Posted by: Efus McWawa | January 28, 2012 at 09:56 AM