Why MUST marriage be redefined?
Oklahoma lawmakers pass horse slaughter bill | Reuters

Why don't same-sex couples want to come up with their own word for marriage?

By Mike Thayer

Let's look at this issue from a purely logical perspective using the English language shall we?

Webster defines marriage as, 1. the state of being married; relation between husband and wife

SYN. - marriage refers to the state of, or relation between, a man and woman who have become husband and wife or to the ceremony marking this union.

That's a definition, a description of what is.

Jeff Gordon is a NASCAR driver, it's a definition, a description of what is.    Gordon is not a Grand Prix driver, he's not an Indy Car driver, he's NASCAR.  That's the description of what is.

Norman Borlaug was a plant pathologist, a definition, a description of what he was.  He wasn't a meteorologist, he wasn't a Heliologist (for those of you who live in University Heights, that's a person who studies the sun).

Describing either of these men vocationally in any other way than what they practice/practiced would not be accurate.   Each of these men practice/practiced a specialty.  

Shouldn't that be respected?   Changing the specialty of Gordon and Borlaug changes the meaning and their contribution does it not?  Redefining the specialty takes away from what is, it does not add to.....

Shouldn't the argument in the name of equality be to add something to the issue instead of taking some meaning away from people with a redefinition? Shouldn't same-sex couples take pride in creating a specialty?  Shouldn't same-sex couples contribute to marriage not by redefining the word, but by crafting a new one?  Now THAT's something to embrace, something a lot of people can support!  Diversity is healthy and creativity can be an inclusive act.   Adding to unions, not taking away or redefining a specialty....

There is an opportunity for same-sex couples to make their mark on society here, trying to redefine marriage - instead of adding to it - is an exercise in squandering if you ask me.

Why shouldn't there be a new term?  Why don't same-sex couples want to come up with a term as they see fit?  Isn't that a better measure of acceptance?  


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

If gay marriage being called something else happened organically, and did not result from legal discrimination against gays, gay marriages simply being called something else might not be terribly offensive. The reason that it is currently objectionable is that gay marriage being described differently is not simply an organic facet of the evolution of language. It would be, instead the result of homophobes intentionally using the law to try to exclude and demean gays. The symbolism, to some people, is saying "you aren't good enough for marriage, so we have to create a separate category that we can deem lesser, even if it has the same legal rights." Which is incredibly offensive.
Think of this civil rights movement comparison: having a separate but equal water fountain, in theory, if it happened purely coincidentally, oughtn't to be terribly offensive. But in reality, separate wasn't equal, and it didn't happen coincidentally. It happened because bigots were trying to exclude and demean black people. It was used as a tool of racial discrimination, which is why it was wrong. Similarly, creating a separate category just to satisfy bigots who want to treat gays as less would be wrong. Legally, marriage covers the rights gay couples want. There is no compelling reason to exclude them from it just because you like the current definition of a word.

This isn't about water fountains or lunch counters. Don't insult readers with that intellectually lazy garbage.

This is about Sodom and Gomorrah, same-sex couples want sexual deviance to be acceptable by society, that's it. Period.

"Equality" for people seeking selfish pleasure.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)